Saturday, July 27, 2013

LUïSA C. ESPOSITO v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN NEW YORK COUNTY. Judge Loretta Preska protecting New York Corruption at Every Turn.

"Please take notice that ADA Lisa Friel's name is omitted from the appeal papers..that's right about the time when Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe left the DDC and went over to the Second Circuit..Also, take notice what Preska writes, "that an appeal would not be taken in good faith"....talk about denial of due process and corruption!!!!!!"


"LUïSA C. ESPOSITO, Plaintiff,


-against-

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK 

IN NEW YORK COUNTY, and individually

ADA JENNIFER STEINER CROW'ELL ESQ. OF THE

DISTRICT ATTORNEY COUNTY of NEW YORK, and

Individually, ADA CHIEF LISA FRIEL ESQ. OF THE

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK,

and the POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NEW

YORK, andthe MANHATTAN SPECIAL VICTIMS SQUAD

ofthe NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, M_ u i;

Defendants.




US Court of Appeals, New York Civil Rights

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiNGRqZTZKeTVDRms/edit?usp=sharing

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

And Don't FORGET, Mike South has Randazza Legal Group all over his sight. Randazza Legal Group's J. Malcom DeVoy is Stalker Sean Tompkins Attorney. Marc Randazza Shuts down massive Blogs that Expose his Unethical Corrupt Behavior. Monica Foster is TARGETED for Exposing them and NAMED by Marc Randazza in Nevada SLAPP suit Randazza v. Cox.

"Thoughts Over The Morning's Second Cup of Coffee: Rob Black Asks is Mike South the Architect of Destruction?


--Gene Ross
Follow Gene Ross at twitter@GeneRoss3; Follow AdultFYI at twitter@Adultfyi1http://adultfyi.com/read.php?ID=59234

For reasons known only to him Rob Black takes the time to address “keyboard warrior” comments on his show. I figure they’re going to write what they’re going to write regardless of facts so there's no such thing as setting the record straight.

Monday afternoon Black spent the last 15 minutes of his show addressing the fact that Monica Foster didn’t let out the information that Samantha Saint’s husband was an attorney.

Had you tuned into his show Friday, you would have heard Black and myself discussing the revelation made on Mike South’s site that Saint’s husband was a lawyer.

Black said he went to a “douchebag blog” owned by Mallcom. “I’m trying to figure out who the writer is because it annoys me.” Apparently that's where Black saw the comments about Foster.

Black also said he feels that Mike South should get more credit than what he’s been getting especially in the reporting on Saint’s husband.

“I feel Mike South doesn’t get the credit when he should get the credit.”

“I saw where Monica Foster everybody’s favorite religious freakazoid was a cunt and a whore because she divulged that poor Samantha Saint had a husband who was a lawyer and that Monica Foster divulged this personal information and she sent the information where he worked and who he was to The Rob Black Show and because of that she’s a piece of shit.”

“I don’t give a fuck what you little children did with your fucking Wiki bullshit that’s still up today and Donny Long’s going crazy. You retards did nothing.

“Monica Foster didn’t say nothing about the lawyer," Black went on to say.

"I didn’t know Samantha Saint had a big shot lawyer for a husband. That’s actually funny to all of us. Mike South is the one. He wrote an article where he sat there and said he had information from inside sources. 

“Monica Foster has done a lot of shitty things, I guess. I’m not part of the bullshit. But she did not divulge any information. Mike South brought up that Samantha Saint did a private and that she has a lawyer-husband. 

"I said this broad goes out with a lawyer? I said to my fans tell me who this fucking lawyer is. Within an hour Monica Foster hit me up that this is the guy. We started talking about it. Riddle me this, jerkoffs, how did Monica Foster do what she did when it was Mike South who told us about the lawyer and we all know that Samantha Saint is a scam artist?"

All Black wanted to know was if Saint’s husband Robert Hinckley Jr. was related to the “guy who shot Reagan.

“While he’s sitting at home litigating cases, I guess all the money he makes isn’t enough that his wife is a shakedown artist with a bunch of pimps. Robert B. Hinckley Jr., tell me you’re not related to the Hinckleys who put their son in a mental institution.

"Robert B. Hinckley Jr., I’m totally confused - do you not make enough where your wife has to be a hooker-shake down- scam artist because you're litigating nothing? I bring this up because jerkoffs want to give credit where credit is not due.

“Mike South, sometimes I wonder if he’s not the true architect of destroying this business. Mike South was like the ringleader of all these retards battling it out for retard supremacy. At the end of the day, nothing happened. The site’s [Porn Wikileaks] still up and the retards still run around.

“They attack her [Foster]. She attacks them. It’s fucking comical with all this shit. Our business is littered with old world order. I think Mike South is the ring leader of this inception of people that are just out there. 

"How a website can blame Monica Foster for causing all of this devastation to poor Miss Samantha Saint. Poor Samantha Saint was involved in a shakedown scam that fucked over a guy that was in charge of Miramax and Disney. Why does no one get that?

“But Monica Foster is a cunt because she talked about poor Samantha Saint’s husband. Mike South is part of the old order. He sat there and said this girl has a lawyer-husband, lawyer-husband, lawyer-husband. Go on her twitter page wow who’s this? It’s her husband.

About Jack Spade, Black said once a pimp, always pimp.

Noting that Spade appeared to be repped by attorney Clyde DeWitt, Black said DeWitt "is the original Gelbard-Fattorosi - he’s the original fucking lawyer fucking bullshit jerkoff who made millions off the business but never did anything in his life that amounted to anything involved in this business. Find me a case that he fought that involved Free Speech and he got people off from going to prison. Never happened.”


Wednesday, July 10, 2013

"Who did Attorney Keith M. Davidson really try to help? Richard Nanula or pornstar Samantha Saint?"

"

MONICAFOSTER JULY 10, 2013 6
meet keith m davidson - Richard Nanula - samantha saintBackground on the Richard Nanula sex scandal: Part 6Part 5Part 4Part 3, Part 2Part 1  – Additional details on LAtimes.com and DailyMail.UK
A PornNewsToday exclusive by Monica Foster (please do not reprint without linking back to the source – thank you bloggers and mainstream media)
On July 9, 2013 LAtimes reporter Daniel Miller wrote a closing article in regards to ex Disney CFO (and now ex Miramax chair) Richard Nanula. The article covers the events that surrounded Nanula’s abrupt departure from Miramax, which came about after a website called TheDirty.com published photos of a man (identified as Nanula) having sex with adult-film actress Samantha Saint.
keith m. davidson - is he Samantha Saint or Richard nanula's legal representation?
Attorney Keith M. Davidson – is he Samantha Saint or Richard Nanula’s legal representation? It’s hard to tell…
When Miller initially began covering the Richard Nanula sex scandal, he contacted me for comment being that I was one of only 2 known websites (the other being GenesisOnline) to have re-posted the alleged photos (which appear to be stills from a Trinity St. Clair video).  I disclosed to Miller that I’d also been contacted by an attorney who had inquired as to “what it would take” for me to remove the article and photos I’d reposted on June 13, 2013 from TheDirty. I told Miller that my response to the attorney (who I assumed to be Nanula’s representation, being he only mentioned the entry on my site which was re-posted from TheDirty), was that I felt if Nanula was incorrectly identified in the photos, he should put out a press release or video testimonial stating so.
Miller immediately inquired as to what the attorney’s response was to my suggestion. I disclosed that the attorney didn’t seem to have a response. He asked if he could call me back on the number I’d called him from (the attorney initially emailed me to contact him via phone), and I said yes. The attorney stated that he was glad to have an “open communication” in regards to the issue and said that he would call me back (of which he never has).
Miller then asked who the attorney was that contacted me – I was hesitant to give the name, but I did tell Miller the lawfirm name: Davidson & Associates (www.KmdLaw.com). Miller seemed to know instantly who contacted me & who I spoke to, but I did not confirm the name with Miller until July 8, 2013 (of which he thanked me for).
meet keith charlie sheen capri anderson
Keith M. Davidson represented Capri Anderson – a young woman who alleged Charlie Sheen physically assaulted her.
Miller’s final inquiry with me on July 8th (the day prior to his posting the closing Nanula article on the LAtimes) in regards to the confirmation of the name of the attorney who initially contacted me, is what has prompted me to research further into exactly who Keith M. Davidson is. The attorney angle seemed to be a paramount detail in Miller’s LAtimes article – and I now believe I know exactly why.
meet keith m davidson secret deal dawn hollandIn addition to Davidson’s involvement with “celebrity” sex scandals, Davidson has also briefly represented a woman by the name of Dawn Holland who made allegations against Lindsay Lohan (Holland fired Davidson shortly after her allegations were made public though, and hired a different attorney).
Holland (who at the time was an employee at the Betty Ford clinic where Lohan was getting treatment) alleged that Lohan physically assaulted her. Holland has stated in interviews that she was under the impression that she would receive a settlement from Lohan (Keith Davidson was Holland’s legal representation at the time) – a $25,000 settlement which never manifested according to reports.
Sara Leal (Ashton Kutcher's alleged mistress) was Keith M. Davidson's client.
Sara Leal (Ashton Kutcher’s alleged mistress) was Keith M. Davidson’s client.
Holland wound up being fired from the Betty Ford clinic due to “breach of confidentiality” in regards to a patient (Lohan). Holland stated in aRadarOnline.com interview:
But as it stands I don’t want to make any comments on Lindsay Lohan or that situation or about Keith because we split on good terms,” she told RadarOnline.com. “I’m not trying to dog him out or speak badly of him. He just wasn’t doing what I needed to be done at the time and that’s why I switched attorneys and the feeling is mutual.
Holland at one point claimed that she was paid $10,000 by TMZ through a bank account of Davidson – this claim later drew the interest of Federal investigators.
The same year (2011) as the Holland/Lohan incident, Davidson represented a client who appears to have remained anonymous, but who has made allegations against an “A-list celebrity” who they claims gave them Herpes. The suit claims that the plaintiff, who is not named or identified as a man or woman, contracted the sexually transmitted disease by the defendant (who is listed as “John Doe” in the complaint) after they engaged in sex and drug use in a Las Vegas hotel room.
Richard Nanula and Samantha Saint - which one did Keith M. Davidson contact me on behalf of?
Richard Nanula and Samantha Saint – which one did Keith M. Davidson contact me on behalf of?
From what I can assess of Davidson, his goal with the clients he represents who make allegations against celebrities (and the wealthy), appears to be to settle the dispute out of court –which leads me to wonder where Davidson’s interests REALLY reside… Is his goal to truly find legal justice and resolution for his clients (and our society as a whole) OR is he simply controlled opposition of the wealthy defendants his clients make allegations against?
Many of Davidson’s clients seem to be sex workers (who are typically looked down upon in society) and the economically disadvantaged. Is Davidson strategically targeting his clients with the pre-meditated agenda of settling out of court – which likely results in an easy payday (for him at least) and favor amongst Hollywood’s wealthy and elite?
In conclusion, when Keith M. Davidson contacted me, his primary interest seemed to be to squelch the flow of information to the public in regards to Richard Nanula’s photographically depicted sexual interaction with Wicked Pictures contract pornstar Samantha Saint.
Both myself and Gene Ross of AdultFYI.com have noticed that certain media outlets have neglected to refer to Samantha Saint by her name (only identifying her as “a pornstar”). One can only speculate as to why TheDirty.com felt the need to remove their posts about this issue…if Davidson contacted TheDirty.com what did he say (or do) to prompt such action?
It’s impossible for me to tell at this stage exactly who Keith M. Davidson contacted me on behalf of, but I’m certain in time the truth will come out – just as I’m certain that the identity of the anonymous source (known as Jizzum Tizzum) who initially tipped me off in regards to Richard Nanula (and various individuals who appear to be attached to organized crime run illegal escort rings ) will one day be known.
Considering that I have PornNewsToday (PNT), TMZ is not a big deal to me at all.
click to enlarge: In this communication from “Jizzum Tizzum”, he takes credit for TheDirty.com posting being removed and he references TMZ. Ironically many of Keith M. Davidson’s clients have been featured on TMZ (most notably Dawn Holland, who claimed to have been paid $10,000 by TMZ through Davidson). 
Considering that I own PornNewsToday (PNT), TMZ is not a big deal being that I’m quite similar to them. 
KEITH M. DAVIDSON [#212216], 39, of Beverly Hills was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on three years of probation with a 90-day actual suspension and he was ordered to take the MPRE within one year and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. The order took effect Aug. 21, 2010.
Davidson stipulated to four counts of misconduct in three matters. He admitted he failed to pursue a medical malpractice case by not appearing at a case management conference and a later hearing, and he took three months to file a motion to set aside a dismissal.
While analyzing a possible medical malpractice case, Davidson failed to inform his potential client about significant developments. He did not make clear that he was only considering the case, that the individual’s medical records were being evaluated by a nurse rather than a doctor, and although he told the man he would not accept his case, the individual continued to call Davidson without getting a response.
The man paid Davidson $750 to evaluate his medical records, but Davidson deposited the money in his general account rather than a client trust account. However, Davidson refunded the money.
In the third matter, he wrote a check against insufficient funds in his client trust account.
In mitigation, Davidson had no prior discipline record, cooperated with the bar’s investigation and he presented evidence of his good character.
 Source of Alexandra Melody Porn News Today Posthttp://pornnewstoday.com/pnt/?p=6007

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Investigative Blogger Files RICO / Racketeering Claim against Porn Industry Lawyers, Judges protecting Prostitution Rings, the Free Speech Coalition, Synaptics, Randazza Legal Group, New York Times, Forbes, WIPO, Manwin, Jordan Rushie Porn Attorney, Kenneth P. White of the Free Speech Coalition, and More.

Blogger Crystal Cox FIGHTS Back and Sues Porn Industry Attorney Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group and Alleged Co-Conspirators for defaming her, attempting to silence her, violating her free speech rights, threatening her porn industry insider sources, protecting porn prostitution rings, and endangering her life and livlihood. 

 Crystal Cox's  RICO / Racketeering Lawsuit against the Free Speech Coalition, Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group, Kenneth P. White, Diana Duke Ari Bass, and other ALLEGED Co-Conspirators.

Crystal L. Cox v. Randazza (Porn Attorney) Docket Nevada RICO / Racketeering Legal Action
http://ia601608.us.archive.org/5/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918.docket.html

RICO / Racketeering Complaint
http://ia601608.us.archive.org/5/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918.1.1.pdf

Crystal L. Cox v. Randazza Legal Group (Porn Law Firm) Florida
http://www.plaintiffcox.com/2013/06/crystal-l-cox-v-randazza-legal-group.html

Below YOU see Fraud on the CourtsSLAPP Lawsuit, Free Speech Suppression, First Amendment Violations as porn attorney MARC J. RANDAZZA sues Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, his former client, in order to SILENCE her and her sources regarding prostitution rings, human trafficking, gang stalking, video technology theft and more. The Nevada Courts, Judge Gloria Navarro shut down my blogs exposing  prostitution rings, human trafficking, gang stalking and more. Judge Gloria Navarro is protecting Porn prostitution rings and the law firms and their co-conspirators as they threaten sources, suppress free speech, wipe out massive online content exposing corruption in the porn industry, and flat out violated the rights of MEDIA Defendant, Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox.

RANDAZZA v. COX court case, which is a SLAPP suit and is a TOTAL violation of the Civil Rights of Marc Randazza's former client Crystal L. Cox.
http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html


Crystal Cox files more Legal Action, in attempt to get help on EXPOSING this massively important Issue, and bringing these porn industry attorneys and the porn industry's dark side that they are protecting.

Crystal L. Cox v. Forbes, Kashmir Hill Journalist ~ Anti-Trust Lawsuit

Forbes and the New York Times DOES NOT have a Right to Defame, Flat Out Lie about who ever they want?   Forbes and the New York Times Painted Crystal Cox out to be a CRIMINAL, while reporting on a Civil Trial for DEFAMATION.  Plaintiff Crystal COX alleges this was and is to suppress the public support for COX and to affect COX's Ninth Circuit appeal in order for BIG Media such as Forbes and the New York Times to KEEP their Monopoly on Free Speech which is a Massive Violation of Anti-Trust Laws.

Crystal L. Cox v. Forbes, Kashmir Hill Docket
http://ia601701.us.archive.org/24/items/gov.uscourts.cand.265997/gov.uscourts.cand.265997.docket.html

Crystal L. Cox v. Forbes, Kashmir Hill Complaint
http://ia601701.us.archive.org/24/items/gov.uscourts.cand.265997/gov.uscourts.cand.265997.1.0.pdf

Crystal L. Cox v. David Carr Journalist and the New York Times
http://www.plaintiffcox.com/2013/05/crystal-l-cox-v-david-carr-new-york.html


More Legal Action FILED against Co-Conspirators in Districts they are Incorporated.

Crystal L. Cox v Randazza Legal Group Florida Lawsuit
http://www.plaintiffcox.com/2013/06/crystal-l-cox-v-randazza-legal-group.html

Crystal L. Cox v Jordan Rushie, Porn Attorney New Jersey
http://www.plaintiffcox.com/2013/06/united-states-district-court-eastern.html


Crystal L. Cox v. Fraud Analyzer Tracy Coenen Chicago / Wisconsin
http://ia801708.us.archive.org/18/items/gov.uscourts.wied.63287/gov.uscourts.wied.63287.1.0.pdf

Crystal L. Cox v. WIPO Panelist, New Jersey Attorney Peter Michaelson


Just how many JUDGES are protecting Porn Industry Attorneys, Law Firms, Companies and their way of "doing business" that is ABOVE the Law?

"Porngate or GattoGate – whatever – What’s up with Diane Duke, Mike Gatto & the FSC" ~ a Monica Foster Porn News Today exclusive. STOP the Illegal, Unethical, Activities of the Free Speech Coalition and of Kenneth P. White, Ari Bass, Sean Tompkins, Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group, who are their THUGS gang stalking industry insiders and whistle blowers.

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Porn News Today Monica Foster "Nanula-Gate continues… Richard Nanula is a SEX ADDICT according to divorce papers – NYpost.com" Richard Nanula Scandal.

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.