Saturday, December 29, 2012
No Matter How Much You Need Money, or How Gorgeous you Are. Do NOT Get into the Porn Industry. Learn How to Make a Living Online without the Evils of the Porn Industry. READ Perfect for Porn by Porn Industry Whistle Blower / Porn Industry Insider Monica Foster and find out Why Porn May not be "Perfect" for You or your Loved One.
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Roxanne Grinage ~ Roxanne Grinage Hirelyrics ~ Roxanne Grinage. Roxanne Grinage ~ Roxanne Grinage Hirelyrics ~ Roxanne Grinage.
Roxanne Grinage ~ Roxanne Grinage Hirelyrics ~ Roxanne Grinage. Roxanne Grinage ~ Roxanne Grinage Hirelyrics ~ Roxanne Grinage.
Have a Tip Regarding Roxanne Grinage ~ Roxanne Grinage Hirelyrics ~ Roxanne Grinage. Roxanne Grinage ~ Roxanne Grinage Hirelyrics ~ Roxanne Grinage. ?
Email your Tip regarding Roxanne Grinage ~ Roxanne Grinage Hirelyrics ~ Roxanne Grinage. Roxanne Grinage ~ Roxanne Grinage Hirelyrics ~ Roxanne Grinage TO Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Randy Wilson Lyme Disease Cover up and Spousal Neglect Case: CPS Cathy Spenser, Montana Human Rights Act, HIPAA Violations - Randy Wilson Interbel CEO Eureka Montana.
One Woman, paying the price of a massive cover up of Rocky Mountain Tick, Lyme Disease in humans in Montana and the massive amount of corruption standing behind those in power. Montana CPS, Montana Judges, County Attorney Bernie Cassidy, Judge Ted O. Lympus, North Valley Hospital, Interbel Coop, and more, now involved in the Randy Wilson case. The facts speak for themselves, however as many of us know well, the TRUTH is down right Criminal in the State of Montana.
Here is More from Mary Wilson regarding the Randy Wilson Case.
"Randy was charged 11-13-08 w/ Discrimination and HIPPA violations, he was
represented by Darrel S. Worm, Attorney, the Attorney for the Nurturing
Center! - Randy's personality disorder - narcissistic power and control
issues - are not only part of his family life, this is PROOF it adversely
affects even his profession/business!
Re: Human Rights Bureau Case No. 0071012467
Case No. 1243-229 Gordon v. Interbel Telephone Coop./Randy Wilson, Manager
Gordon represented by Gary D. Seaman, Seaman Law Firm.
Randy, General Manager of Interbel, represented by Darrell S. Worm, Ogle &
Worm, PLLP.
The deposition testimony of Serban Ionescu, M.D., Michael Newman, M.D was
made part of the evidentiary record. -
DANIEL - Michael Newman, MD, is the psychiatrist I went to for a Psych Eval.
on December 2, 2007, with proof that I didn't have Munchasuen's - he said,
"Mary, you have all the proof in the medical records, that is all you need,
you just need a good attorney." I asked Dr. Newman to testify on my behalf,
he said - "Mary I can't do that, and I don't need to see you anymore." Dr.
Newman is on staff with Kalispell Regional Medical Center (Dr. Stein) and
North Valley Hospital (Dr. Reeb), because he is on staff with KRMC he could
not ethically testify against a physician on his own staff under the same
corporate attorneys.
ISSUES
The key issues are whether Interbel (Randy) illegally discriminated against
Gordon in employment because of his disability and what reasonable meansures
the department should order to restify the harm Gordon suffered and to guard
against further discrimination.
22. Wilson did not follow Interbel's policy No. 511 (HIPPA Compliance
Policy). There is no credible evidence that Wilson considered the policy,
or took any action to comply with the policy in his efforets to ascertain
Gordon's condition or in his decision to terminate Gordon's employment for
refusing to provide the unfettered access to Gordon's medical information
which Wilson requested.
23. Wilson offered no credible explanation for this failure and refusal to
follow Interbel's HIPPA policy. His rationalization at hearing (that
handling the whole matter himself, he thought he was better ensuring
Gordon's privacy) is utterly unconvincing. Wilson ignored the written policy
and required that Gordon provide a sweeping release, in addition to
undergoing an independent evaluation, with all information to be provided to
Wilson, Gordon's immediate supervisor. It is absurd to propose that such a
procedure wouls better ensure Gordon's privacy than Interbel's written
poolicy, and it appears on its face that the information Wilson demanded
exceeded the information Interbel was entitled to obtain under HIPPA and
under its own policies and procedures.
24. There is no evidence that either Wilson or Gordon, in their
interactions, made any reference to Interbel's HIPPA policy, let alone that
they discussed it together. Intervbel's policy governs Interbel's conduct,
not the conduct of the employee whose privavcy is at issue. Wilson, rather
than Gordon, had the obligation to reference and follow the policy.
Interbel has not presented any credible evidecne, let alone any substantial
credible evidence, of any legitimate business reason for treating Gordon's
privacy in a significantly different and more adversarial fashion that that
required by Interbel's HIPPA policy.
26. Counsel for Gordon (Seaman) notified Wilson that Gordon refused to
provide Wilson with more extensive access to his medical records, and was
not required to sign the medical authorization.
30. Interbel's attorney (Worm), sent a letter to Gordon affiarming that
Gordon's failure to authorize release of his medical records was the
immediate reason for Interbel's termination of Gordon's employment.
33. Had Inteerbel complied with it own HIPPA policies and obtained mroe
limited medical information than Wilson requested, Wilson could havehad the
informaiton necessary to make a proper deceision about further
accommodation. As a result, Gordon would have continued to receive his pay
after Interbel's receipt of Dr. Ionescu's letter. Thus, Gordon lost his
salary and benefits, as well as suffering substantial emotional distress, as
he described credibly at hearing, which was more distressing that it would
otherwise have been because Interbel terminated him improperly, out of
discriminatory animus, and with undue haste.
35. Had Randy followed Interbel's own policeis, no illegal discrimination
would have occurred in this matter. Therefore, the conditions upon
Interbel's future conduct relevant to this particular kind of disability
discrimination and the reasonable measures necessary to correct this
discriminatory practice are, in addition to a mandatory injunction, an order
requiring Interbel to submit to the Human Rights Bureau a plan for training
of its management team, including specifically its manager, regarding HIPPA
privacy requirements (including Montana statutory and regulatory
requirements) as well as applicable state and federal employment disability
law, generally for HRB review, thereafter revising and/or then implementing
that plan as HRB may direct.
DISSCUSSION
SUMMARY
Interbel fired Gordon because he refused to give unfetttered access to his
medical records to his supervisor as demanded, in violation of Interbel's
own medical privacy procedures. Gordon was an otherwise qualified
individual with a disability. Interbel failed and refused to accommodate
him by appropriately considering a further leave of absence. After he
decided to fire Gordon, Interbel received a medical report indicating
Gordon could not return to work for 3 to 6 months. Damages because of
Grodon's discriminatory discharge from to are -
A. Interbel Unlawfully Discrimination against Gordon.
Coffman v. Niece (1940), 110 Mont. 541, 105 P. 2d 661.
Montana law prohibits discrimination against an employee because of
disability. Mont. Code Ann. 49-2-303(1) (a). A disability is a physical or
mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of a person's major
life activities, or a record of such an impairment, or a condition regarded
as such an impairment. Mont. Code Ann $49-2-101(19)(a).
Here is More from Mary Wilson regarding the Randy Wilson Case.
"Randy was charged 11-13-08 w/ Discrimination and HIPPA violations, he was
represented by Darrel S. Worm, Attorney, the Attorney for the Nurturing
Center! - Randy's personality disorder - narcissistic power and control
issues - are not only part of his family life, this is PROOF it adversely
affects even his profession/business!
Re: Human Rights Bureau Case No. 0071012467
Case No. 1243-229 Gordon v. Interbel Telephone Coop./Randy Wilson, Manager
Gordon represented by Gary D. Seaman, Seaman Law Firm.
Randy, General Manager of Interbel, represented by Darrell S. Worm, Ogle &
Worm, PLLP.
The deposition testimony of Serban Ionescu, M.D., Michael Newman, M.D was
made part of the evidentiary record. -
DANIEL - Michael Newman, MD, is the psychiatrist I went to for a Psych Eval.
on December 2, 2007, with proof that I didn't have Munchasuen's - he said,
"Mary, you have all the proof in the medical records, that is all you need,
you just need a good attorney." I asked Dr. Newman to testify on my behalf,
he said - "Mary I can't do that, and I don't need to see you anymore." Dr.
Newman is on staff with Kalispell Regional Medical Center (Dr. Stein) and
North Valley Hospital (Dr. Reeb), because he is on staff with KRMC he could
not ethically testify against a physician on his own staff under the same
corporate attorneys.
ISSUES
The key issues are whether Interbel (Randy) illegally discriminated against
Gordon in employment because of his disability and what reasonable meansures
the department should order to restify the harm Gordon suffered and to guard
against further discrimination.
22. Wilson did not follow Interbel's policy No. 511 (HIPPA Compliance
Policy). There is no credible evidence that Wilson considered the policy,
or took any action to comply with the policy in his efforets to ascertain
Gordon's condition or in his decision to terminate Gordon's employment for
refusing to provide the unfettered access to Gordon's medical information
which Wilson requested.
23. Wilson offered no credible explanation for this failure and refusal to
follow Interbel's HIPPA policy. His rationalization at hearing (that
handling the whole matter himself, he thought he was better ensuring
Gordon's privacy) is utterly unconvincing. Wilson ignored the written policy
and required that Gordon provide a sweeping release, in addition to
undergoing an independent evaluation, with all information to be provided to
Wilson, Gordon's immediate supervisor. It is absurd to propose that such a
procedure wouls better ensure Gordon's privacy than Interbel's written
poolicy, and it appears on its face that the information Wilson demanded
exceeded the information Interbel was entitled to obtain under HIPPA and
under its own policies and procedures.
24. There is no evidence that either Wilson or Gordon, in their
interactions, made any reference to Interbel's HIPPA policy, let alone that
they discussed it together. Intervbel's policy governs Interbel's conduct,
not the conduct of the employee whose privavcy is at issue. Wilson, rather
than Gordon, had the obligation to reference and follow the policy.
Interbel has not presented any credible evidecne, let alone any substantial
credible evidence, of any legitimate business reason for treating Gordon's
privacy in a significantly different and more adversarial fashion that that
required by Interbel's HIPPA policy.
26. Counsel for Gordon (Seaman) notified Wilson that Gordon refused to
provide Wilson with more extensive access to his medical records, and was
not required to sign the medical authorization.
30. Interbel's attorney (Worm), sent a letter to Gordon affiarming that
Gordon's failure to authorize release of his medical records was the
immediate reason for Interbel's termination of Gordon's employment.
33. Had Inteerbel complied with it own HIPPA policies and obtained mroe
limited medical information than Wilson requested, Wilson could havehad the
informaiton necessary to make a proper deceision about further
accommodation. As a result, Gordon would have continued to receive his pay
after Interbel's receipt of Dr. Ionescu's letter. Thus, Gordon lost his
salary and benefits, as well as suffering substantial emotional distress, as
he described credibly at hearing, which was more distressing that it would
otherwise have been because Interbel terminated him improperly, out of
discriminatory animus, and with undue haste.
35. Had Randy followed Interbel's own policeis, no illegal discrimination
would have occurred in this matter. Therefore, the conditions upon
Interbel's future conduct relevant to this particular kind of disability
discrimination and the reasonable measures necessary to correct this
discriminatory practice are, in addition to a mandatory injunction, an order
requiring Interbel to submit to the Human Rights Bureau a plan for training
of its management team, including specifically its manager, regarding HIPPA
privacy requirements (including Montana statutory and regulatory
requirements) as well as applicable state and federal employment disability
law, generally for HRB review, thereafter revising and/or then implementing
that plan as HRB may direct.
DISSCUSSION
SUMMARY
Interbel fired Gordon because he refused to give unfetttered access to his
medical records to his supervisor as demanded, in violation of Interbel's
own medical privacy procedures. Gordon was an otherwise qualified
individual with a disability. Interbel failed and refused to accommodate
him by appropriately considering a further leave of absence. After he
decided to fire Gordon, Interbel received a medical report indicating
Gordon could not return to work for 3 to 6 months. Damages because of
Grodon's discriminatory discharge from to are -
A. Interbel Unlawfully Discrimination against Gordon.
Coffman v. Niece (1940), 110 Mont. 541, 105 P. 2d 661.
Montana law prohibits discrimination against an employee because of
disability. Mont. Code Ann. 49-2-303(1) (a). A disability is a physical or
mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of a person's major
life activities, or a record of such an impairment, or a condition regarded
as such an impairment. Mont. Code Ann $49-2-101(19)(a).
Disability discrimination includes failing or refusing to make accommodations (that
would not be an undue hardship for the employer) for an otherwise qualified
employee. Mont. Code Ann. #49-2-101(19) (B). Since Grodon was such a
person, Interbel's decision to fire him for refusing unfettered access to
his private health information without attempting reasonable accommodation
was unlawful disability discrimination.
1. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Can Cause a Disability Under Montana
Law.
Montana has no statutory exclusion form the general definition of disabilityfor post traumatic stress disorder. Post Traumatic Stress is a mental or
physical impairment under the Americans with Disability Act. See 42 U.S.
C. #12114(a) In the Analysis section of the regulations implementing Title
I of the ADA, the E.E.O.C. commented that disabled employees "includ(e)
those disabled by Post Traumatic Stress, 56 Fed. Reg. #
il lationrtgions im
Montana amende3d tis Human Rights act to confirm to the language of the ADA
in 1993. House Bill 496, laws of Montana 1993, Chapter 407, see Preamble
and Section 3. In conforming the Human rights Act to the ADA, Montana
presumably adopted the existing federal interpretations and applications of
the existing ADA provisions, including existing regulations addressing Post
Traumatic Stress as a disability in . On the other hand, Montana
did nhot necessarily adopt the regulations and court decisions issued after
the effective date of the Montana amendments. Subsequent federal precedent
can provide guidance when there are substantive similarities in the laws and
also in the public policy considerations and there is not controlling
Montana law, Betterfield v. Siodney Pub. Scho., 2001 MT 177, 306 Mont. 179,
32 P.3d 1243; and, Hafner v. Conoco, Inc. (1994) 268 Mont. 396, 886 P.2d
947, 950-51.
The dismissal would have been affirmed if the Montana Human Rights Act
permitted adverse employment and education action against a worker due to
Post Traumatic Stress. The Montana Supreme Court has a "longstanding
practice of affirming a trial court's result, even if that result was basedon incorrest reasoning." Nelson v. State 34, 2008 MT 336 Mont. P3d ;
citing Inre Truyst B (In re Will of Dunham), 19, 2008 MT 153, 343 Mont. 240,
184 P.3d 296 and W.F. Band v. Talmage Saucier v. McDonald's
Rest., Estate of Voey de
The Court would have affirmed the dismissal even if the state of
limitations defense was inapplicable, since without a potentially valid
claim of discrimination because of PTSD the result - dismissal - would be
been correct even if the reason was wrong. Powell is a clear indication
that Montana will follow the federal approach, as it should, under its
Human Rights Act.
2 Under Applicable Precedent, Mary's Lyme, Fraud and False Accusations of
Munchasuen's by proxy, Delusion/Somatorm-type in violations of the 1st,
2nd, 43th, 5th, 6th, 8th, 9th and 14th Amendments and (ADA) law, while
recipients of Federal financial assistance, Christy, a minor under (ADA)
Title I, II (504) Rehabilitation, Medicaid and Food Stamps while victims of
Domestic Violence, denied their rights to legal counsel and guardian ad
litems, with sudden removal and detainment of her daughters by law
enforcement in violation of Child Protective Services Investigation
September 15, 2006 of: No Concerns of Harm, Unsubstantiated, File Closed; in
violation of Family Court Servcies' own policies and procedures, the
improper state-mandated Agency/Duty of Authority to investigate
abuse/neglect of minor children, further, in violation(s) of HIPPA (without
a Court Order to access their protected health information, as required by
law in a Court proceeding), further, in violation(s) of the 4th (unlawful
search and seizure of protected health information without a Court Order and
unlawful search and seizure of minor children in violations of FCSs' own
policies and procedures (improper state-mandated Agency to investigate
abuse/neglect of minor children and recommend immediate removal by law
enforcement), in violations of the 14th Amendment (due process) -
would not be an undue hardship for the employer) for an otherwise qualified
employee. Mont. Code Ann. #49-2-101(19) (B). Since Grodon was such a
person, Interbel's decision to fire him for refusing unfettered access to
his private health information without attempting reasonable accommodation
was unlawful disability discrimination.
1. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Can Cause a Disability Under Montana
Law.
Montana has no statutory exclusion form the general definition of disabilityfor post traumatic stress disorder. Post Traumatic Stress is a mental or
physical impairment under the Americans with Disability Act. See 42 U.S.
C. #12114(a) In the Analysis section of the regulations implementing Title
I of the ADA, the E.E.O.C. commented that disabled employees "includ(e)
those disabled by Post Traumatic Stress, 56 Fed. Reg. #
il lationrtgions im
Montana amende3d tis Human Rights act to confirm to the language of the ADA
in 1993. House Bill 496, laws of Montana 1993, Chapter 407, see Preamble
and Section 3. In conforming the Human rights Act to the ADA, Montana
presumably adopted the existing federal interpretations and applications of
the existing ADA provisions, including existing regulations addressing Post
Traumatic Stress as a disability in . On the other hand, Montana
did nhot necessarily adopt the regulations and court decisions issued after
the effective date of the Montana amendments. Subsequent federal precedent
can provide guidance when there are substantive similarities in the laws and
also in the public policy considerations and there is not controlling
Montana law, Betterfield v. Siodney Pub. Scho., 2001 MT 177, 306 Mont. 179,
32 P.3d 1243; and, Hafner v. Conoco, Inc. (1994) 268 Mont. 396, 886 P.2d
947, 950-51.
The dismissal would have been affirmed if the Montana Human Rights Act
permitted adverse employment and education action against a worker due to
Post Traumatic Stress. The Montana Supreme Court has a "longstanding
practice of affirming a trial court's result, even if that result was basedon incorrest reasoning." Nelson v. State 34, 2008 MT 336 Mont. P3d ;
citing Inre Truyst B (In re Will of Dunham), 19, 2008 MT 153, 343 Mont. 240,
184 P.3d 296 and W.F. Band v. Talmage Saucier v. McDonald's
Rest., Estate of Voey de
The Court would have affirmed the dismissal even if the state of
limitations defense was inapplicable, since without a potentially valid
claim of discrimination because of PTSD the result - dismissal - would be
been correct even if the reason was wrong. Powell is a clear indication
that Montana will follow the federal approach, as it should, under its
Human Rights Act.
2 Under Applicable Precedent, Mary's Lyme, Fraud and False Accusations of
Munchasuen's by proxy, Delusion/Somatorm-type in violations of the 1st,
2nd, 43th, 5th, 6th, 8th, 9th and 14th Amendments and (ADA) law, while
recipients of Federal financial assistance, Christy, a minor under (ADA)
Title I, II (504) Rehabilitation, Medicaid and Food Stamps while victims of
Domestic Violence, denied their rights to legal counsel and guardian ad
litems, with sudden removal and detainment of her daughters by law
enforcement in violation of Child Protective Services Investigation
September 15, 2006 of: No Concerns of Harm, Unsubstantiated, File Closed; in
violation of Family Court Servcies' own policies and procedures, the
improper state-mandated Agency/Duty of Authority to investigate
abuse/neglect of minor children, further, in violation(s) of HIPPA (without
a Court Order to access their protected health information, as required by
law in a Court proceeding), further, in violation(s) of the 4th (unlawful
search and seizure of protected health information without a Court Order and
unlawful search and seizure of minor children in violations of FCSs' own
policies and procedures (improper state-mandated Agency to investigate
abuse/neglect of minor children and recommend immediate removal by law
enforcement), in violations of the 14th Amendment (due process) -
a) Miranda Rights, right to legal counsel, guardian ad litems, the right to be heard
within (72) hours in front of a Magistrate, b) the right to offer and
present evidence (Michael Keedy and I in bad-faith with intentional malicious
intent causing emotional harm, were prohibited and restricted from access to
the medical records of Dr. Green, Dr. Stein, Dr. Reeb and Dr. Cole
physicians in care of C.W.'s and J.W.'s since June 2006, they all received
a 'Rubber-Stamped' ORDER from the Court per 'FAX' "Do not release medical
records of the minor children, Christy and Jessica Wilson, without
authorization of their father, given temporary sole care and custody." I
called Bonnie Olson, the 11th Judical District's Administrator who is theonly person authorized to use the "Rubber Stamp" of Ted O. Lymus, Judge, she
informed me that she never issued that Order (does Bruce McEvoy feloniously
use the "Rubber Stamp" of Judge Lympus?) For our defense at the Show
Cause Hearing, October 17, 2006, Michael Keedy at the OTSC Hearing had to
ask Lympus for a Stipulation/Order to access our children's medical records
for our defense, further a Continuance was not scheduled/granted, c) the
right to have witnesses testify in my behalf (Dr. Reeb, Dr. Green, Dr. Cole
and Child Protective Services, at that point, until later, after I reported
medical neglect of Randy and Dr. Stein to (CPS) for investigation,
Margarita Peterson, (CPS) Lincoln County caseworker was assigned for
investigation, I Faxed her all the medical records, her Fraudulent excuse to
not protect me from the Munchausen's Accusation, she said, "I do not have
medical terminology to interpret the medical records" (I told her my 6 yo
could read them and interpret them), she said that she was assigning the
case to her (CPS) Supervisor, Lincoln County, Cathy Spencer, I Faxed the
medical records to Cathy Spencer
I asked CPS Lincoln County Cathy Spenser why my daughters held in
medical neglect denied "warranted" referrals by Dr. Christine Green,
San Francisco to Columbia, an Adult/Pediatric Lyme/Assoc. Diseases
Medical Center "both girls in May 2006 acquired tick bites w/ positive
clinical and serology's of Rocky Mtn. Spotted Fever, Erhlichiosis,
Lyme disease and Mycoplasma ferm. and very low (CD57) Killer 'T
subsets - very concerning in young children this age - w/ referrals to
Drs. Fallon and Corbera at Columbia for more sophisticated testing and
to determine if C.W. has an 'active' encephalitis encephalopathy, the
most likely cause of C.W.'s neurological urapraxia disabilities and
developmental delays.
CPS Cathy Spenser on phone said "You are not allow to accompany the
girls to medical evaluations - YOU WOULD MOST LIKELY CAUSE A BIASED
EVALUATION!!!" I said then, you are most likely causing further
BRAIN, HEART and OTHER MAJOR ORGAN DAMAGE in Christy, you (DPHHS),
Flathead and Lincoln County Courts are "politically" prosecuting me
for bogus false-fabricated Munchausen's by proxy, I will see you ALL
in (ADA) Discrimination Jury Trial Federal Court.""
within (72) hours in front of a Magistrate, b) the right to offer and
present evidence (Michael Keedy and I in bad-faith with intentional malicious
intent causing emotional harm, were prohibited and restricted from access to
the medical records of Dr. Green, Dr. Stein, Dr. Reeb and Dr. Cole
physicians in care of C.W.'s and J.W.'s since June 2006, they all received
a 'Rubber-Stamped' ORDER from the Court per 'FAX' "Do not release medical
records of the minor children, Christy and Jessica Wilson, without
authorization of their father, given temporary sole care and custody." I
called Bonnie Olson, the 11th Judical District's Administrator who is theonly person authorized to use the "Rubber Stamp" of Ted O. Lymus, Judge, she
informed me that she never issued that Order (does Bruce McEvoy feloniously
use the "Rubber Stamp" of Judge Lympus?) For our defense at the Show
Cause Hearing, October 17, 2006, Michael Keedy at the OTSC Hearing had to
ask Lympus for a Stipulation/Order to access our children's medical records
for our defense, further a Continuance was not scheduled/granted, c) the
right to have witnesses testify in my behalf (Dr. Reeb, Dr. Green, Dr. Cole
and Child Protective Services, at that point, until later, after I reported
medical neglect of Randy and Dr. Stein to (CPS) for investigation,
Margarita Peterson, (CPS) Lincoln County caseworker was assigned for
investigation, I Faxed her all the medical records, her Fraudulent excuse to
not protect me from the Munchausen's Accusation, she said, "I do not have
medical terminology to interpret the medical records" (I told her my 6 yo
could read them and interpret them), she said that she was assigning the
case to her (CPS) Supervisor, Lincoln County, Cathy Spencer, I Faxed the
medical records to Cathy Spencer
I asked CPS Lincoln County Cathy Spenser why my daughters held in
medical neglect denied "warranted" referrals by Dr. Christine Green,
San Francisco to Columbia, an Adult/Pediatric Lyme/Assoc. Diseases
Medical Center "both girls in May 2006 acquired tick bites w/ positive
clinical and serology's of Rocky Mtn. Spotted Fever, Erhlichiosis,
Lyme disease and Mycoplasma ferm. and very low (CD57) Killer 'T
subsets - very concerning in young children this age - w/ referrals to
Drs. Fallon and Corbera at Columbia for more sophisticated testing and
to determine if C.W. has an 'active' encephalitis encephalopathy, the
most likely cause of C.W.'s neurological urapraxia disabilities and
developmental delays.
CPS Cathy Spenser on phone said "You are not allow to accompany the
girls to medical evaluations - YOU WOULD MOST LIKELY CAUSE A BIASED
EVALUATION!!!" I said then, you are most likely causing further
BRAIN, HEART and OTHER MAJOR ORGAN DAMAGE in Christy, you (DPHHS),
Flathead and Lincoln County Courts are "politically" prosecuting me
for bogus false-fabricated Munchausen's by proxy, I will see you ALL
in (ADA) Discrimination Jury Trial Federal Court.""
Source, Sent In TO Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox
More on the Randy Wilson Story, Click Below
Saturday, July 14, 2012
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group. MarcRandazza.com and the War with Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and Internet Savvy Blogger Crystal Cox Rages On.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, an unEthical Attorney. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza had a phone interview with me, Blogger Crystal Cox, to determine if Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza wanted or could take the Obsidian Finance Vs. Crystal Cox case on appeal.
After Crystal Cox spoke with Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group, I bought MarcRandazza.com, because it was available and I wanted to use the domain name to further the cause of the case and Free Speech rights.
Then, soon after this call, in a highly unethical manner, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group contacted the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox, without letting Crystal Cox know that he was doing so, or even representing her. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group gave away privileged information, negotiated my case and Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group gave private information.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did not contact me to let me know he represented me. Yet Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group told members of the First Amendment bar that he, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did represent Crystal Cox.
Meanwhile, I Crystal Cox Blogger, had picked another attorney who had previously contacted me. This attorney contacted Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group about his yapping to the First Amendment Bar in representing me. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claimed, indeed that he did represent Blogger Crystal Cox, me. Which was in no way True.
Just after this conversation Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza sent me, Crystal L. Cox an email saying that he Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group would represent me Crystal Cox on appeal.
I told Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group that I did not want Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group to represent me, as I had chose another attorney who had treated me with dignity and respect.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group pretended to be fine with this decision. And Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group told me that all was fine with it. We had spoke previously about my marketing abilities.
And so about a month after Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group acted as if he was fine that I chose another attorney, I emailed Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and asked Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group if he had use for internet marketing in his business. He said he did not need internet marketing for his firm and he demanded that I give him MarcRandazza.com, even though Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group had never bought that domain name in all these years as an alleged Internet Lawyer and Domain Name Expert, Hmmm !!!!
When I refused to Give him the domain name, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group got very mad and threatened me. He said you really want to make an enemy of me, in that purely mafia style threatening manner. After this, to teach me a lesson Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group conspired with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to set me up for Extortion.
And Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group had no proof that any such thing happened. In fact, blogger Crystal Cox, me, had not written anything to EXPOSE Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group until Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group offered to join the Plaintiff and set up his own alleged client.
Blogger Crystal Cox NEVER offered to remove anything she had written online about Marc Randazza for MONEY. I even refused his offer to buy the Domain Name. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group continues to lie and claim that blogger Crystal Cox, me, wanted money to remove information. However Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is flat out lying. I had not written one word about Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group until he conspired to set me up and harm me and I defended myself in the search engines.
I felt extremely compelled to set the record RIGHT, get my side of the story in the search engines and to expose Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and how he treats his clients.
How can Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group justify using his alleged clients information to set them up for things they did not do and how can Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group use information he was given in confidence as a weapon to ruin the life of his client, or client to be?
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's hypocritical actions led me to buy more Domain Names to make fun of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and his lack of knowledge in Domain Name Law, Intellectual Property and Free Speech rights as proven by the fact that he never bought that domain name, and that he got my blogs and accounts shut down to suppress MY free speech. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group even filed for a protective order out of Las Vegas in order to suppress Free Speech.
It sure seems that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group will go to any lengths to SUPPRESS Free Speech. If that Free Speech is about Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.
Yet Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group defends others to have the same right to own domain names with other people's name in it. Seriously, it is blatantly obvious that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is a hypocrite.
How in the world can Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claim to be an advocate of Free Speech when Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has done everything he can, short of taking my life, in order to suppress my Free Speech Rights.
To further my point that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group was ill equipped at domain name law, I purchased the domain name of his child and his wife. Of which I created a Blog on JenniferRandazza.com, to, again prove that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did not have the skills he proclaimed to have in this Internet Legal World. The other domain name, was NEVER, ever published in any way by me. Yet Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group flat out lied to big media and claimed that I did publish this domain name. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group painted blogger Crystal Cox, me, in False Light deliberatly. Yet, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has no accountability.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group ruins lives. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group spreads lies about his clients and ex-clients and with seemingly no remorse.
After having made my point that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is an Idiot. I, Blogger Crystal Cox deleted the domain name that allegedly was dumbass Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's darkest hour of terror. And I gave away JenniferRandazza.com, the name of the wife of Free Speech / Domain Name Attorney Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's wife. I gave the name away to further the cause of exposing injustice in the Porn Industry and to help expose stalking and activities of those connected to Randazza Legal Group's J. Malcolm Devoy. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is said to have stolen that domain name from a GoDaddy Account, with the help of a Godaddy Employee Allegedly.
I gave MarcRandazza.com to the same person for the same reasons. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group seemed to have threatened this person and even posted on chat sites the persons car and make of care and wishing them death. So in fear they returned the domain name to me. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group then filed an Arbritration complaint to steal the Domain name MarcRandazza.com that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group was to dumb to buy.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claims to be an Advocate of Free Speech, however, Blogger Crystal Cox knows that to be an absolute falsehood.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group shut down one of my Google accounts, simply because I made fun of and exposed Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group had my wordpress blogs shut down because Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did not like me exposing the actions, hypocrisy and butt hurt of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group lied to Forbes regarding Crystal Cox. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has lied to the world about me. Nothing I can do but tell the Truth, the whole Truth and have Faith.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group lied to a national radio program regarding the actions of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claimed in the Sandra Fluke case that Butthurt does not pay. Yet Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is butthurt and stealing intellectual property over it. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is butthurt and ruining lives over it.
Do your homework BEFORE you even speak to Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group. Blogger Crystal Cox claims that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has so many connections that the law and the constitution is irrelevant. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group lies to big media and they eat it up. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group whines to anyone who will believe Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's flat out lies.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has inside connections everywhere and will get your blog shut down, will steal your domain names, and Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group will violate your constitutional rights, your Free Speech rights. And all under the guise of Free Speech Advocate.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT a good man.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT an honest attorney.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT a Free Speech Advocate.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT a Truth Teller.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT a domain name law expert.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT an advocate of the Constitutional Rights of All.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, a hypocrite and will do anything to silence Free Speech when that Free Speech is telling on Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.
Do your home work regarding Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group. Find your own facts about Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group. Read the cases of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and decide for yourself if the actions of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group against blogger Crystal Cox seem to be hypocritical.
Got a tip regarding Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group OR J. Malcolm Devoy? Email your Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group OR J. Malcolm Devoy tip to Crystal Cox at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com .
Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox is dedicated to EXPOSING Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group, and J. Malcolm Devoy.
If Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group OR J. Malcolm Devoy find a way to make me disappear. I trust my readers will take up the reigns in Exposing Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and J. Malcolm Devoy.
After Crystal Cox spoke with Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group, I bought MarcRandazza.com, because it was available and I wanted to use the domain name to further the cause of the case and Free Speech rights.
Then, soon after this call, in a highly unethical manner, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group contacted the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox, without letting Crystal Cox know that he was doing so, or even representing her. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group gave away privileged information, negotiated my case and Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group gave private information.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did not contact me to let me know he represented me. Yet Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group told members of the First Amendment bar that he, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did represent Crystal Cox.
Meanwhile, I Crystal Cox Blogger, had picked another attorney who had previously contacted me. This attorney contacted Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group about his yapping to the First Amendment Bar in representing me. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claimed, indeed that he did represent Blogger Crystal Cox, me. Which was in no way True.
Just after this conversation Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza sent me, Crystal L. Cox an email saying that he Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group would represent me Crystal Cox on appeal.
I told Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group that I did not want Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group to represent me, as I had chose another attorney who had treated me with dignity and respect.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group pretended to be fine with this decision. And Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group told me that all was fine with it. We had spoke previously about my marketing abilities.
And so about a month after Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group acted as if he was fine that I chose another attorney, I emailed Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and asked Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group if he had use for internet marketing in his business. He said he did not need internet marketing for his firm and he demanded that I give him MarcRandazza.com, even though Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group had never bought that domain name in all these years as an alleged Internet Lawyer and Domain Name Expert, Hmmm !!!!
When I refused to Give him the domain name, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group got very mad and threatened me. He said you really want to make an enemy of me, in that purely mafia style threatening manner. After this, to teach me a lesson Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group conspired with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to set me up for Extortion.
And Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group had no proof that any such thing happened. In fact, blogger Crystal Cox, me, had not written anything to EXPOSE Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group until Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group offered to join the Plaintiff and set up his own alleged client.
Blogger Crystal Cox NEVER offered to remove anything she had written online about Marc Randazza for MONEY. I even refused his offer to buy the Domain Name. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group continues to lie and claim that blogger Crystal Cox, me, wanted money to remove information. However Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is flat out lying. I had not written one word about Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group until he conspired to set me up and harm me and I defended myself in the search engines.
I felt extremely compelled to set the record RIGHT, get my side of the story in the search engines and to expose Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and how he treats his clients.
How can Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group justify using his alleged clients information to set them up for things they did not do and how can Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group use information he was given in confidence as a weapon to ruin the life of his client, or client to be?
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's hypocritical actions led me to buy more Domain Names to make fun of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and his lack of knowledge in Domain Name Law, Intellectual Property and Free Speech rights as proven by the fact that he never bought that domain name, and that he got my blogs and accounts shut down to suppress MY free speech. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group even filed for a protective order out of Las Vegas in order to suppress Free Speech.
It sure seems that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group will go to any lengths to SUPPRESS Free Speech. If that Free Speech is about Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.
Yet Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group defends others to have the same right to own domain names with other people's name in it. Seriously, it is blatantly obvious that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is a hypocrite.
How in the world can Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claim to be an advocate of Free Speech when Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has done everything he can, short of taking my life, in order to suppress my Free Speech Rights.
To further my point that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group was ill equipped at domain name law, I purchased the domain name of his child and his wife. Of which I created a Blog on JenniferRandazza.com, to, again prove that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did not have the skills he proclaimed to have in this Internet Legal World. The other domain name, was NEVER, ever published in any way by me. Yet Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group flat out lied to big media and claimed that I did publish this domain name. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group painted blogger Crystal Cox, me, in False Light deliberatly. Yet, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has no accountability.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group ruins lives. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group spreads lies about his clients and ex-clients and with seemingly no remorse.
After having made my point that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is an Idiot. I, Blogger Crystal Cox deleted the domain name that allegedly was dumbass Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's darkest hour of terror. And I gave away JenniferRandazza.com, the name of the wife of Free Speech / Domain Name Attorney Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's wife. I gave the name away to further the cause of exposing injustice in the Porn Industry and to help expose stalking and activities of those connected to Randazza Legal Group's J. Malcolm Devoy. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is said to have stolen that domain name from a GoDaddy Account, with the help of a Godaddy Employee Allegedly.
I gave MarcRandazza.com to the same person for the same reasons. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group seemed to have threatened this person and even posted on chat sites the persons car and make of care and wishing them death. So in fear they returned the domain name to me. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group then filed an Arbritration complaint to steal the Domain name MarcRandazza.com that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group was to dumb to buy.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claims to be an Advocate of Free Speech, however, Blogger Crystal Cox knows that to be an absolute falsehood.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group shut down one of my Google accounts, simply because I made fun of and exposed Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group had my wordpress blogs shut down because Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did not like me exposing the actions, hypocrisy and butt hurt of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group lied to Forbes regarding Crystal Cox. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has lied to the world about me. Nothing I can do but tell the Truth, the whole Truth and have Faith.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group lied to a national radio program regarding the actions of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claimed in the Sandra Fluke case that Butthurt does not pay. Yet Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is butthurt and stealing intellectual property over it. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is butthurt and ruining lives over it.
Do your homework BEFORE you even speak to Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group. Blogger Crystal Cox claims that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has so many connections that the law and the constitution is irrelevant. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group lies to big media and they eat it up. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group whines to anyone who will believe Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's flat out lies.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has inside connections everywhere and will get your blog shut down, will steal your domain names, and Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group will violate your constitutional rights, your Free Speech rights. And all under the guise of Free Speech Advocate.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT a good man.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT an honest attorney.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT a Free Speech Advocate.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT a Truth Teller.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT a domain name law expert.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT an advocate of the Constitutional Rights of All.
Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, a hypocrite and will do anything to silence Free Speech when that Free Speech is telling on Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.
Do your home work regarding Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group. Find your own facts about Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group. Read the cases of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and decide for yourself if the actions of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group against blogger Crystal Cox seem to be hypocritical.
Got a tip regarding Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group OR J. Malcolm Devoy? Email your Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group OR J. Malcolm Devoy tip to Crystal Cox at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com .
Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox is dedicated to EXPOSING Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group, and J. Malcolm Devoy.
If Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group OR J. Malcolm Devoy find a way to make me disappear. I trust my readers will take up the reigns in Exposing Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and J. Malcolm Devoy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)